So, last week, Chris Roberts said his farewells as Dear Leader. I’m told he was still in his office at Woolwich Town Hall as the minutes ticked down until the end of his reign at 7pm last Wednesday. And as the effective editor of the council’s weekly newspaper, Greenwich Time, he got to pen his own farewell.


In case you were wondering, “leave this world a little better than you found it” is a quotation from Robert Baden-Powell, the founder of the Scout movement.

More telling, though, from a politician closely associated with huge building projects, is “make no small plans, for they have no power to stir men’s souls”. That’s attributed to Daniel Burnham, a US architect who worked on some of the world’s earliest skyscrapers, including New York City’s Flatiron Building. Something to remember when Berkeley Homes’ huge towers start to loom over Woolwich in the next few years.

Possibly more telling than that, though, is a revealing comment he made at his final full council meeting in March, which you can listen to below. He’s heavily tipped to end up in some consultancy or advisory role, so until he re-emerges, let’s leave this as the last word.

He was paying tribute to departing councillors. But it was pretty clear he wasn’t talking about them when he said: “The service of the public is a noble calling, whether you’re doing it as a councillor or as an officer. No-one in a democracy does it for the money. It can be long, it can be tiring, but as we all know, it can be rewarding.

“It can result in people delving into your personal lives, and as we all know it’s full of journalists, bloggers and tweeters who think that your moral compass and motives are as base as theirs sometimes seem to be – and that public works and public good are something to be denigrated by those who seek to pursue them [sic].”


That was then, this is now.

Greenwich Time, 17 June 2014

The Dear Leader is no more, so congratulations and welcome to Denise Hyland as the new Greenwich Council leader, as trumpted by – where else? – Greenwich Time.

It’s lucky for Hyland that one of the more controversial projects under her past watch as regeneration cabinet member, the botched refurbishment of the Greenwich and Woolwich foot tunnels, is finally nearing completion. Indeed, she’d also been saddled with fronting the council’s Bridge The Gap campaign to build the Silvertown Tunnel and a bridge at Gallions Reach – in spite of opposition from her own party.

The party members’ opposition meant Labour’s position in May’s election was subtly different. “Bridge The Gap is dead,” one Labour source insisted to me during the council election. And, indeed, look at what the Labour manifesto said…

Greenwich Labour manifesto, 2014

A little bit of wiggle room emerged. And Labour candidates were telling people on the doorstep that things had changed. Here’s Stephen Brain, now Peninsula ward councillor, on 23 April.

Stephen Brain on Twitter

But on 24 April, despite what was in the Labour party manifesto, here’s what Denise Hyland was telling Boris Johnson, responding to his London Plan

London Plan response, 24 April 2014

Was Denise Hyland just following orders? Here she is from the News Shopper last week:

“I’m saying that we need a package of river crossings, absolutely we do.

I’m not going to get drawn into over whether we’ll accept or refuse a single crossing. I want to work with my colleagues, my Labour colleagues in the majority group and get a consensus after we’ve seen the proposals.”

That sounds like Bridge The Gap is still alive.

“Of course I’m concerned about air quality. I think it’s obviously a very difficult balance. If we actually look at our figures, 85 per cent of people thought we needed additional river crossings. 76 per cent wanting Silvertown, 73 per cent wanting a bridge at Gallions. People seem to think that doing nothing is not an option.”

Let’s not forget that Greenwich Council tried to rig that consultation, of course. Perhaps the new chief whip, one Stephen Brain, needs to get his leader into line…

Generally, the News Shopper interview seemed to promise more of the same than anything new. When asked about opening up the council, she said “I obviously want ward councillors to be frontline councillors, they’re the representatives of the council in the community and they represent their people and its for them to channel people’s voices through to the council” – ie, they should do their job. From this early interview, don’t expect any move away from the current top-down decision-making any time soon.

Then again, her Greenwich Time “interview” talked up the importance of listening to communities – since the Shopper’s piece went up on the website on Friday, shortly before GT goes to press, I can’t help wondering if the piece underwent a hasty rewrite as the introductory paragraph doesn’t match the headline. After all, Hyland is now the effective editor of GT…

It’s early days, and Hyland has to get her feet under the table first. While Roberts’ chief executive, Mary Ney, remains in place, big changes are probably unlikely – although a new cohort of Labour councillors will want to make their presence felt.

But who has her old job of regeneration cabinet member, the most important on the council?

Danny Thorpe

Curiously, the job didn’t go to an big hitter such as Jackie Smith, John Fahy or David Gardner – but to Danny Thorpe, the 30-year-old Shooters Hill councillor best known for spending a year of his first term in office in Australia. When a skint Thorpe had to return to London after six months to attend a council meeting to avoid a by-election being triggered, the council’s Labour group had to pay his air fare.

Thorpe, who used to work in events management for Hackney Council, will be juggling his cabinet portfolio with teacher training at a primary school in Dartford. You could always try to follow him on Twitter, but his profile’s locked. Mind you, the last time I saw it, it was full of photos of him and singer Beverley Knight.

Hyland and Thorpe are also both on the planning board along with ex-deputy leader Peter Brooks and ex-chief whip Ray Walker – so the old guard are still represented there.

There are other new faces in the new cabinet. Highly-rated newcomer Sizwe James takes business, employment and skills, while fellow new councillor Chris Kirby gets housing. Miranda Williams, in her second term, joins the cabinet as member for cultural and creative industries. Returning councillor David Gardner takes health and adult social care.

Maureen O’Mara stays in the cabinet, taking community wellbeing and public health; while Jackie Smith also stays in the cabinet, but loses her highly-praised role in charge of children’s services to take on community safety and environment. John Fahy now takes on children’s services as well as being deputy leader. The “Greener Greenwich” portfolio (created by Roberts after the Greens broke through as an electoral force in 2006) has been dumped, with Harry Singh talking charge of customer and community services.

Cynics never the changed the world, so this website won’t be writing the new team off just yet. Denise Hyland and her team need to prove they are better than the unravelling shambles that came before them – and they’ll need to pick up some of the pieces, too.

Of course, Greenwich councillors should be held to account for past actions, but those actions may not necessarily be an accurate prediction of the future. It’d be good to see a review of past contracts signed with developers – as Hammersmith & Fulham’s new Labour administration is carrying out after usurping a Tory regime that also looked a bit too close to builders – but frankly that won’t happen.

Those who kept their head down and did as they were told under a bullying, stifling regime need the chance to find their feet and prove to us they can make a difference. The way Greenwich borough is run desperately needs to change – will they be the ones to deliver?

PS. Former Labour councillor Alex Grant has started a blog – and if you’ve made it down this far, his first post will be essential reading. Former Tory councillor Nigel Fletcher has also returned to being a digital scribe, and his account of losing his seat is also well worth reading.

6 replies on “Will Greenwich Council’s new boss be the same as the old boss?”

  1. I am only going to say a couple of quite short things – I note that you ignore my still continuing blog, which I will start to put sensible things on, but at the moment I am too busy producing leaflets and setting up campaign meetings.
    With regard to change in the Council, we have of course been here before – the great revolution of the early 1980s which was planned and plotted and which changed the culture and direction of the council for nearly two decades. Three of those involved are still on the Council and I’m glad to see they have all got offices to fulfil this time round. It was my bad luck to stand, and lose, in the 1980s and then to finally be elected exactly when the structure of the Council changed in a way that eventually side lined backbenchers – together with a centralising regime which both stifled initiative and cut off sources of information. It has been even worse luck to be thrown out by Peninsula Ward when I might, at last, have had the chance to do something. However, I do have some ideas.
    I also want to say that personally I never had a problem with Chris. I had come on the Council having had many run-ins with him over many years with in my job and in the party. I shared a ward with him for eight years and rather to my surprise he was fine, and it was not him who did the bullying Like all of us he is a complex person, but very very bright.
    No doubt you will hear from me again.

  2. The new Council should be accorded the chance to show what they intend to do and how they intend to do it. There are new councillors and many old ones in new jobs. Of course, I’m saddened by Mary’s departure, from the Council; I always enjoyed her insights into what was going on and valued her help that was given in so many ways. She’s left the Council but not Greenwich so I trust that her influence will still help to shape the Borough.

    I’ve been invited to a meeting that includes the new leader, tomorrow morning. The sale and redevelopment of the Brocklebank Road industrial estate (opposite Charlton ASDA) has not gone well with the developers appearing to renege on promises they made to relocate tenants. Denise Hyland suggested a meeting and when tenants asked if their advisers could attend, she immediately agreed. That is a good sign so I’m waiting to see what she offers and will be bringing up the wider issues of the significance of local industry.

    I think Mary is entirely right in her comments on centralisation: we need to encourage change by offering discussion. Objection may come later but it’s not the way to start out.

  3. I am concerned about Ms Hyland’s reference to “a package of river crossings” and welcome the apparent announcement by Mr Brain (hi Steve) of his opposition to the Silvertown Tunnel. I do hope that this is not just because it would be in his back yard. I too, do not want a thumping great road through my own back yard. I participated in opposition to the ELRC (including providing written evidence to the Enquiry about footpaths across Woodlands Farm) and to the Thames Gateway. Plans for a crossing at Gallions are rearing their ugly heads again and I fear that Silvertown may be just a red herring.

  4. …and what is Mr Thorpe’s stance on river crossings, bearing in mind both his new role and his proximity to Shooters Hill?

  5. Seriously, the regeneration lead is a 30 year old trainee primary school teacher, whose other work experience was organising events for a council? I am waiting for the Local Authority version for The Thick of It and I wonder where they will go…..

  6. You mean The Thick of it wasn’t a documentary based on every council you ever knew?

Comments are closed.