Run to the Beat / Chris Roberts

Organisers of the controversial Run to the Beat half-marathon still haven’t paid Greenwich Council the £10,000 they promised it for hosting the race, it’s emerged.

The council asked for a contribution “towards its sports legacy work” after agreeing that the borough would host the race for a sixth year, according to an answer given under the Freedom of Information Act.

It was the first time Greenwich had asked for money from IMG Worldwide, and the sum is due to rise to £20,000 if next year’s race gets the go-ahead.

But two months after September’s event ended in acrimony after runners complained about bottlenecks and poor organisation, the council is yet to receive a penny of that money, according to the FOI answer.

The event has long been mired in trouble, with residents complaining of poor information and upheavals; with IMG insisting on running the race on a circular route via Greenwich, Blackheath, Charlton and Woolwich.

More recently, Greenwich Council chief executive Mary Ney has refused to investigate allegations of a conflict of interest surrounding leader Chris Roberts and the race. Roberts is chair of a charity, Greenwich Starting Blocks, which is given free places by IMG. The recent threatening voicemail featured Roberts insisting his administration decides whether 2014’s race takes place, rather than the one installed after May’s election, after which he has said he will stand down.

The links between Greenwich Starting Blocks and Run to the Beat have also been confirmed by the council. Over 1,000 places have been donated to the council charity since the first race in 2008.

But only a handful have actually been filled. In the race’s first year, 250 places were offered, and 144 were taken up. This figure slumped to 26 in 2009. In 2011, the number of free places was cut to 100 – but none of them were taken up.

Greenwich Time, August 11 2013

Numbers rose off the back of last year’s Olympics, but this year, another 100 Run To The Beat places were donated by IMG, and Greenwich Council promoted them in its weekly propaganda paper, Greenwich Time (right). But again, none were taken up.

Places donatedPlaces taken up

Documents revealed during the licensing process showed that IMG was planning to double its donation to Greenwich Council to £20,000 next year – even though it’s far from certain that the event will go ahead.

Indeed, even at £20,000, it’s possible to argue Greenwich lets Run To The Beat have the borough’s streets cheaply – Royal Parks gets at least £10,000 for allowing it use of Greenwich Park alone.

And there’s no real destination for the cash other than “sports legacy work”.

But then again it’s paid nothing at all so far. “We need to think – well, what does this bring into the borough?,” cabinet member Maureen O’Mara said of the race last year. So far, that seems to be an unpaid bill, a heap of aggravation, and more questions about the council leader. How long will local councillors put up with it for?

11.55pm update: At tonight’s council meeting, Chris Roberts denied any knowledge of donations from RTTB to Greenwich Starting Blocks when questioned by opposition leader Spencer Drury. Deputy leader Peter Brooks said no decision had been made about 2014’s race, and “ward councillors might have something to say”. Poor quality audio below:

8 replies on “Run to the Beat: Greenwich Council still hasn’t been paid”

  1. On the basis of the evidence so far it seems that Councillors will put up with RTTB as long as their allegiance to the Labour party remains stonger than their responsibilities to their constituents. Broken promises from my own ward Councillor on this very issue have made me decide not to vote Labour in the next election. And I have told her this so she is in no doubt.

  2. How much does Greenwich Starting Blocks insist runners raise for their free place? That might explain the variations in numbers taking up places.

  3. Why is anyone surprised? IMG made a lot of pretty promises to get its license and promptly reneged on them. Let’s hope the licensing committee does better by Greenwich next time round but don’t bet the rent on it.

  4. Tongue in cheek guys, tongue in cheek. Of course it was predictable.
    When this money is paid (probably the end of the financial year) I would love to know how they intend to spend it. Would it go into some central fund? Would it be divided between the council wards that get the inconvenience? Or would sporting legacy mean Starting Blocks? As this charitable enterprise seems to get very little from the allocation of free entries, I imagine 10K or more would do them very nicely thank you. And stuff the communities who put up with this event that is forced upon them (mostly).

  5. Does anyone know when the Royal Park gets paid? And Jim’s suggestion would explain why HImself would want to get decisions made now not later and why the foul mouthed voicemail got sent. . .

Comments are closed.